# “A simple way to prove my Theory”

#### “A simple way to prove my Theory”

Let’s feed a supercomputer with the following task: Let’s assume a large sphere with a large radius, and feed a computer using the equation to allows us to calculate the volume of the sphere.

Let’s begin with pi= 3.1 and then allow the computer to draw an initial sphere. As the computer begin to add more and more decimals of pi let it draw one sphere for each new pi decimal on top of the previous one and so on.

After a while we will be able to observe a thin cloud-like edge around the original sphere. My take us that if we were able to mathematically prove that the density of the outer spheres decrease following the inverse square law, my Theory about the origin of gravity and the EM force find the same physical explanations in the incompatibility of space and energy/matter, based on the fractional and infinite nature of space around the sphere.

Energy (as in the case of subatomic particles) fluctuates or oscillates between the “original sphere” and the space-volume within the fuzzy cloud composed by the outer spheres that the computer was able to draw by using hundreds of the decimals after the original 3.1 (it’s important to remember that those spheres make the volume increasingly fractional so as the spheres are inserted, the lines at the edge of those spheres will be less dense than the first ones. If we could build such model, we could also be able to observe and calculate the rate of proximity between the outer spheres with respect to the original one and if the rate coincides with the inverse square law then we got the T.O.E. right there!

Take a look at the simplest form of resonant circuit:

This phenomenon is self-explanatory and what you see happening during the oscillation is exactly what happens to the energy of subatomic particles between the particle-wave duality fluctuation. When the energy is stored in the coil represented in the circuit, it takes the magnetic configuration. This magnetic momentum is when the entire energy of the particle’s charge (particle) is spread into the edge of the sphere (fuzzy cloud). Remember that I stated that the volume of the sphere tends to be fractionally infinite due to the irrationality of the mathematical constant pi. The second cycle of the oscillation occurs when the magnetic momentum (energy spread in the cloud) begins to shrink into a nucleus or point-particle shape at the center of the sphere. When that happens, the entire energy of the subatomic particle (Ex. electron) becomes electric charge and as you could observe in the animation above, the polarity of the charge “spins” upward to downward” directions in the plaques of the condenser. The same oscillating magnetic poles are present in the coil magnetic field. This is the explanation why magnetic mono-poles are another mathematical illusion impossible in our reality. You can have one electric charge but you can’t get half cycle of one electron’s oscillation . A magnetic pole is the result of the complete electric charge of the electron (mass) spread into the fractional volume of the sphere. Put in a simpler way: The magnetic momenta of one electron are separated in time lagging 90 degrees the electric charge (point-particle), those two poles exist in different instants just as the two spins of its charge.

# “THE SPACE-ENERGY INCOMPATIBILITY PRINCIPLE”

#### “THE SPACE-ENERGY INCOMPATIBILITY PRINCIPLE”

The following is a quote from Wikipedia depicting the ‘Quantum Electrodynamic Vacuum’:

The quantum theory asserts that a vacuum, even the most perfect vacuum devoid of any matter, is not really empty. Rather the quantum vacuum can be depicted as a sea of continuously appearing and disappearing [pairs of] particles that manifest themselves in the apparent jostling of particles that is quite distinct from their thermal motions. These particles are ‘virtual’, as opposed to real, particles. …At any given instant, the vacuum is full of such virtual pairs, which leave their signature behind, by affecting the energy levels of atoms”. (Joseph Silk “On the Shores of the Unknown”)

Assuming my interpretation of infinite fractional space within the volume of spheres to be correct, what would space look like in the presence of background energy? We know the perfect zero-energy vacuum doesn’t exist, and energy is “appearing and disappearing” (by an act of magic due to the absence of commonsensical scientific explanation up to present times) but why…? What makes energy fluctuate? in other words, oscillate between a duality state of wave and “quasi-particle” in the case of photons? Most generally speaking… what is behind this chaotic and unstable state between space (aka vacuum of space) and subatomic energy [quantized energy packets]? You see… one of our most effective and “exact theories” concerning the exchange of energy particles in the EM realm of forces is QED and physics couldn’t explain in a simple and understandable manner the origin of the “magic act” behind the very theoretical PRINCIPLE making their theory possible!

I quote:

“The quantization of the electromagnetic field, means that an electromagnetic field consists of discrete energy parcels, photons. Photons are massless particles of definite energy, definite momentum, and definite spin.

In order to explain the photoelectric effect, Einstein assumed heuristically in 1905 that an electromagnetic field consists of parcels of energy of amount , where h is Planck’s constant and ν is the wave frequency. In 1927 Paul A. M. Dirac was able to weave the photon concept into the fabric of the new quantum mechanics and to describe the interaction of photons with matter…” (quoting from Wikipedia)

Couldn’’t the magnetic cycle of the ‘electromagnetic field’ depicted above, the phase when the photon’s energy was spreading into the fractional infinite space and into a fuzzy cloud along its propagation? Photons, also accordingly to the first paragraph, are massless ‘particles’ with definite energy, momentum and spin (meaning quantized ones). Have you ever asked yourselves the question to why are those properties of photons defined in that way?

By the way, would you agree with me if I told you that photons (in their particle-wave state during their propagation through space) are also perfect spheres forced into waves by their lack of mass?

We know with certainty that electrons are perfectly spherical in shape but the obvious reason we could observe it is because they have mass while photons don’t.

In simple words, why is there a Planck’s constant that makes the rules of a quantifiable and indivisible nature of energy? I’m not questioning those physical facts, I’m only questioning the reasons behind them. In a more philosophical and poetical way as Einstein put it once: What were God’s thoughts when created the universe?

To answer that question we must first ask ourselves the following question:

Where are photons coming from? They come from energy scattering from atomic orbitals when electrons jump between their orbits. That scattering phenomenon occurs constantly and endlessly across the entire universe. Atoms are the same in every point of the universe which make photons part of our reality and they are all defined by the same principles no matter the place chosen across our known universe.

QED call them “virtual particles” due to their ephemeral  and yet important role of those ‘particles’ in the understanding of the EM force and their mutual interactions with real particles (electrons). That sounds to me more like a process that we can’t observe but actually occurs, in other words, a process that elapses at a FTL speed and one we will never be able to watch in real time but we must accept is real.

What makes gravity possible? The same incompatibility principle! The reasons gravity has no polarity, no charge and no spin is because matter in planets and celestial bodies unlike subatomic particles can’t physically spread into the fractional infinite nature around the edges of the sphere. Gravity as a variable density of “fractionality of space” around planetarium spheres does affect and interact with with everything standing on the surface of the planet and that includes atomic clocks too… that is the theoretical support of the famous space-time fabric proposed by Einstein which in fact is just a result of a limited observational capability facing a more faster process taking place.

# “Pi and the fuzzy cloud of electrons” #### The equations listed below are some of the most important equations you could find in physics:

• Period of a simple pendulum with small amplitude
##### (you may click on the points above and they will take you to the Wikipedia page where each subject will be treated theoretically)

They all have one thing in common : the irrational pi. The same one you see in the equation of the figure on top. Electrons are almost perfect spheres according to newly performed experiments and we know that with the technological levels available today in science, the volume of the cloud you’ll see below in the second figure can be also calculated helping us to define the limits of the fractional infinite space occupied by the energy of the electron inside its cloud-sphere.

By the way, the figure below is a “montage” an incredibly pathetic lie about what the photography was meant to capture. That cloud and the darker point at the center are never together in real time! It’s an oscillatory process between particle point (where charge and mass exists) and a following cycle of pure cloud where the energy of the quanta disperse itself into the fractional infinite within the volume of the sphere. In English, the picture is a collection of multiple frames like in a movie but superposing all, one in top of the other, got it now? The picture above is duality in one shot. It’s the wave and the particle states in the same photograph. In simple terms… you’re looking at the wave and the particle at the same time. That picture that looks like a sphere is the same process followed by an electron when orbiting atoms.

The importance of the understanding of this process will liberate us from the need of the Einstein’s fictitious ether concept and will explain in ways even a 6 year old kid would understand, why duality is not only innate of every quantum particle (Fermions / Bosons) but a process that makes EM waves propagate at c and makes duality particle-wave an understatement instead of a paradoxical nonsense. It’s obvious for you to derive the logical conclusion that the sequence must elapse within the entire wavelength of the EM wave which also means that those “picture frames” mentioned above had to elapse in a F.T.L. speed.

My point is pretty simple. When physicists use those equations I mentioned in blue and it’s time to introduce the value of pi, what value they’ll take?

3.14 or 3.141 or 3.1415 or 3.14159 or 3.141592… how many decimals they insert? 20, 30 or 100 decimals?

Let me help! Click in below!

https://www.piday.org/million/

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

How many decimals must be included in those equations until is fair to say: “it’s enough with this ones!” See my point now?

Allow me to express my opinion about this very important issue of pi. The energy at the core of quantum particles is spread inside the volume of the cloud that you see in the second figure. The energy of a quantum particle is not infinite but quantized (a packet of energy). Infinite inside the volume extends towards a fractional infinite because of the irrationality of pi. The two concepts (1) energy and (2) space are incompatible and this means that there’s no mathematical solution to a stable existence of energy due to the fractional and infinite nature of space that extends in both directions outwardly and also inwardly. The extension or spreading of the quantum energy in space is on the other hand limited by the define magnitude of energy of the quanta and the volume of the space inside the cloud; both in my own views are perfectly quantized and with some smart mathematics, I believe that the exact number of decimals of pi to be used in our calculations could also be eventually determined.

Miguel De Zayas

[look up for my articles in FB @thewizardofpi]