“A simple way to prove my Theory”

“A simple way to prove my Theory”

Let’s feed a supercomputer with the following task:


Let’s assume a large sphere with a large radius, and feed a computer using the equation to allows us to calculate the volume of the sphere.

Let’s begin with pi= 3.1 and then allow the computer to draw an initial sphere. As the computer begin to add more and more decimals of pi let it draw one sphere for each new pi decimal on top of the previous one and so on.

After a while we will be able to observe a thin cloud-like edge around the original sphere. My take us that if we were able to mathematically prove that the density of the outer spheres decrease following the inverse square law, my Theory about the origin of gravity and the EM force find the same physical explanations in the incompatibility of space and energy/matter, based on the fractional and infinite nature of space around the sphere.

Energy (as in the case of subatomic particles) fluctuates or oscillates between the “original sphere” and the space-volume within the fuzzy cloud composed by the outer spheres that the computer was able to draw by using hundreds of the decimals after the original 3.1 (it’s important to remember that those spheres make the volume increasingly fractional so as the spheres are inserted, the lines at the edge of those spheres will be less dense than the first ones. If we could build such model, we could also be able to observe and calculate the rate of proximity between the outer spheres with respect to the original one and if the rate coincides with the inverse square law then we got the T.O.E. right there!

Take a look at the simplest form of resonant circuit:

This phenomenon is self-explanatory and what you see happening during the oscillation is exactly what happens to the energy of subatomic particles between the particle-wave duality fluctuation. When the energy is stored in the coil represented in the circuit, it takes the magnetic configuration. This magnetic momentum is when the entire energy of the particle’s charge (particle) is spread into the edge of the sphere (fuzzy cloud). Remember that I stated that the volume of the sphere tends to be fractionally infinite due to the irrationality of the mathematical constant pi. The second cycle of the oscillation occurs when the magnetic momentum (energy spread in the cloud) begins to shrink into a nucleus or point-particle shape at the center of the sphere. When that happens, the entire energy of the subatomic particle (Ex. electron) becomes electric charge and as you could observe in the animation above, the polarity of the charge “spins” upward to downward” directions in the plaques of the condenser. The same oscillating magnetic poles are present in the coil magnetic field. This is the explanation why magnetic mono-poles are another mathematical illusion impossible in our reality. You can have one electric charge but you can’t get half cycle of one electron’s oscillation . A magnetic pole is the result of the complete electric charge of the electron (mass) spread into the fractional volume of the sphere. Put in a simpler way: The magnetic momenta of one electron are separated in time lagging 90 degrees the electric charge (point-particle), those two poles exist in different instants just as the two spins of its charge.  








The following is a quote from Wikipedia depicting the ‘Quantum Electrodynamic Vacuum’:

The quantum theory asserts that a vacuum, even the most perfect vacuum devoid of any matter, is not really empty. Rather the quantum vacuum can be depicted as a sea of continuously appearing and disappearing [pairs of] particles that manifest themselves in the apparent jostling of particles that is quite distinct from their thermal motions. These particles are ‘virtual’, as opposed to real, particles. …At any given instant, the vacuum is full of such virtual pairs, which leave their signature behind, by affecting the energy levels of atoms”. (Joseph Silk “On the Shores of the Unknown”)

Assuming my interpretation of infinite fractional space within the volume of spheres to be correct, what would space look like in the presence of background energy? We know the perfect zero-energy vacuum doesn’t exist, and energy is “appearing and disappearing” (by an act of magic due to the absence of commonsensical scientific explanation up to present times) but why…? What makes energy fluctuate? in other words, oscillate between a duality state of wave and “quasi-particle” in the case of photons? Most generally speaking… what is behind this chaotic and unstable state between space (aka vacuum of space) and subatomic energy [quantized energy packets]? You see… one of our most effective and “exact theories” concerning the exchange of energy particles in the EM realm of forces is QED and physics couldn’t explain in a simple and understandable manner the origin of the “magic act” behind the very theoretical PRINCIPLE making their theory possible!

I quote:

“The quantization of the electromagnetic field, means that an electromagnetic field consists of discrete energy parcels, photons. Photons are massless particles of definite energy, definite momentum, and definite spin.

In order to explain the photoelectric effect, Einstein assumed heuristically in 1905 that an electromagnetic field consists of parcels of energy of amount , where h is Planck’s constant and ν is the wave frequency. In 1927 Paul A. M. Dirac was able to weave the photon concept into the fabric of the new quantum mechanics and to describe the interaction of photons with matter…” (quoting from Wikipedia)

Couldn’’t the magnetic cycle of the ‘electromagnetic field’ depicted above, the phase when the photon’s energy was spreading into the fractional infinite space and into a fuzzy cloud along its propagation? Photons, also accordingly to the first paragraph, are massless ‘particles’ with definite energy, momentum and spin (meaning quantized ones). Have you ever asked yourselves the question to why are those properties of photons defined in that way?

By the way, would you agree with me if I told you that photons (in their particle-wave state during their propagation through space) are also perfect spheres forced into waves by their lack of mass?

We know with certainty that electrons are perfectly spherical in shape but the obvious reason we could observe it is because they have mass while photons don’t.

In simple words, why is there a Planck’s constant that makes the rules of a quantifiable and indivisible nature of energy? I’m not questioning those physical facts, I’m only questioning the reasons behind them. In a more philosophical and poetical way as Einstein put it once: What were God’s thoughts when created the universe?

To answer that question we must first ask ourselves the following question:

Where are photons coming from? They come from energy scattering from atomic orbitals when electrons jump between their orbits. That scattering phenomenon occurs constantly and endlessly across the entire universe. Atoms are the same in every point of the universe which make photons part of our reality and they are all defined by the same principles no matter the place chosen across our known universe.

QED call them “virtual particles” due to their ephemeral  and yet important role of those ‘particles’ in the understanding of the EM force and their mutual interactions with real particles (electrons). That sounds to me more like a process that we can’t observe but actually occurs, in other words, a process that elapses at a FTL speed and one we will never be able to watch in real time but we must accept is real.

What makes gravity possible? The same incompatibility principle! The reasons gravity has no polarity, no charge and no spin is because matter in planets and celestial bodies unlike subatomic particles can’t physically spread into the fractional infinite nature around the edges of the sphere. Gravity as a variable density of “fractionality of space” around planetarium spheres does affect and interact with with everything standing on the surface of the planet and that includes atomic clocks too… that is the theoretical support of the famous space-time fabric proposed by Einstein which in fact is just a result of a limited observational capability facing a more faster process taking place. 





WARNING! Dear physics enthusiasts: Not having equations to prove these ideas doesn’t make them wrong. You could criticize me for not offering a mathematical background to support a theoretical argument of the existence of a fractional infinite within the volume holding a quanta in space and its interaction between particle-wave but you can’t deny my arguments either.

At some point in the future, I’m absolutely sure that my vision will be proven 100 % correct. I may not be around but, I’ll still be the first to understood and having published the implications of the irrational nature of pi and its role in the fundamental incompatibility between energy and space; the same incompatibility that produces the oscillation that originates in EM waves in the vacuum of space. The same phenomenon that will get ride of the need for an invisible ether proposed by Einstein himself to justify his space-time arguments… and also the same incompatibility at the heart of the reason for the speed of light.

That will mean more than anything else to me… Just as Einstein once said: “I want to know His [God] thoughts, the rest will be in the details”. 

Visit me in Facebook by searching for my key @thewizardofpi and discover the truth preventing science from finding the Theory of Everything.

A very long time ago, there was a a huge flaw in the perception of space. Space was always conceived as infinite outwardly toward the stars and beyond but its infinite nature inwardly has been conveniently and intentionally hidden. My articles denounce this fact with simple examples that even a child could understand. 

The key for a deeper  understanding of our reality  lies entirely in the interpretation of the nature of the geometry of space in the presence of energy or matter.

The only reasons that (a) Einstein conceived a false existence of “ether” to justify the propagation of EM waves and (b) physicists are cheating in their equations with constant renormalization tricks to make observations closer to reality is explained in my articles.

Just Google my nickname THE WIZARD OF PI and you’ll find me. In FACEBOOK go to search for a friend and just write @thewizardofpi and check it out! Feel free to share, publish and comment my articles with your friends, copyrights don’t apply here.


There’s an obvious flaw in today’s physics that’s why you can’t explain this either:


“Pi and the fuzzy cloud of electrons”


(Do you want to see your science teachers or professors having a hard time trying to answer you a simple question? Read my article and ask them a simple question!
***By the way, as the legitimate author of this posting and the theory behind it, I authorize you to download, publish and share this content with others without any concerns about copyright infringement BS, In fact I urge you to.)

The equations listed below are some of the most important equations you could find in physics:

  • Period of a simple pendulum with small amplitude
(you may click on the points above and they will take you to the Wikipedia page where each subject will be treated theoretically)

They all have one thing in common : the irrational pi. The same one you see in the equation of the figure on top. Electrons are almost perfect spheres according to newly performed experiments and we know that with the technological levels available today in science, the volume of the cloud you’ll see below in the second figure can be also calculated helping us to define the limits of the fractional infinite space occupied by the energy of the electron inside its cloud-sphere. 

By the way, the figure below is a “montage” an incredibly pathetic lie about what the photography was meant to capture. That cloud and the darker point at the center are never together in real time! It’s an oscillatory process between particle point (where charge and mass exists) and a following cycle of pure cloud where the energy of the quanta disperse itself into the fractional infinite within the volume of the sphere. In English, the picture is a collection of multiple frames like in a movie but superposing all, one in top of the other, got it now? The picture above is duality in one shot. It’s the wave and the particle states in the same photograph. In simple terms… you’re looking at the wave and the particle at the same time. That picture that looks like a sphere is the same process followed by an electron when orbiting atoms. 

The importance of the understanding of this process will liberate us from the need of the Einstein’s fictitious ether concept and will explain in ways even a 6 year old kid would understand, why duality is not only innate of every quantum particle (Fermions / Bosons) but a process that makes EM waves propagate at c and makes duality particle-wave an understatement instead of a paradoxical nonsense. It’s obvious for you to derive the logical conclusion that the sequence must elapse within the entire wavelength of the EM wave which also means that those “picture frames” mentioned above had to elapse in a F.T.L. speed.

My point is pretty simple. When physicists use those equations I mentioned in blue and it’s time to introduce the value of pi, what value they’ll take?

3.14 or 3.141 or 3.1415 or 3.14159 or 3.141592… how many decimals they insert? 20, 30 or 100 decimals?

Let me help! Click in below!




How many decimals must be included in those equations until is fair to say: “it’s enough with this ones!” See my point now?

Would you dare asking your science teachers about this? How many decimals will be OK and why, Mr. professor?

Allow me to express my opinion about this very important issue of pi. The energy at the core of quantum particles is spread inside the volume of the cloud that you see in the second figure. The energy of a quantum particle is not infinite but quantized (a packet of energy). Infinite inside the volume extends towards a fractional infinite because of the irrationality of pi. The two concepts (1) energy and (2) space are incompatible and this means that there’s no mathematical solution to a stable existence of energy due to the fractional and infinite nature of space that extends in both directions outwardly and also inwardly. The extension or spreading of the quantum energy in space is on the other hand limited by the define magnitude of energy of the quanta and the volume of the space inside the cloud; both in my own views are perfectly quantized and with some smart mathematics, I believe that the exact number of decimals of pi to be used in our calculations could also be eventually determined.


Miguel De Zayas


[look up for my articles in FB @thewizardofpi]


“What makes possible the absorption of photons by electrons?”

Don’t try to Google that question because it’s useless just as it will be to search for the process that creates EM waves and so on… physics professors will avoid any question concerning to the reasons-to-be of the phenomenon because they have no answers to give you. The closest you could get is a mere description of the process, so I will quote it below and offer an answer of my own interpretation:

“When an electron is hit by a photon of light, it absorbs the quanta of energy the photon was carrying and moves to a higher energy state… Electrons therefore have to jump around within the atom as they either gain or lose energy” [end of quote]

It’s indeed a very primitive definition but physicists won’t be much farther than that either, they may use a more sophisticated language to impress you or even to confuse you with technical details about the issue but at the end you won’t get the answer to my original question either. If you believe that I’m behaving pretty arrogantly… don’t take my word for it! Please…next time you meet a physicist friend of yours simply ask him/her the same question and see what happens.

Electrons move in atomic orbits because their energy is in a constant oscillation between a particle and a wave states (sometimes called quantum harmonic oscillation). This also answers another question though: are electrons particles or just waves the entire time they move around their orbits? the simple answer is both. How do I know? because according to my theory the energy of the electron is corpuscular in one cycle while in the next cycle all its energy is spread into the infinite of fractional space within the volume that the energy of the electron (at rest) is contained. 

* The explanation of the oscillatory process is explained in its entire detail in earlier publications in this site. https://www.symbiosissite.wordpress.com/

When a photon hits the electron its energy joins the energy of the electron and both become part of the oscillation between “normal space” and “infinite fractional space”. At this point if the absorbed energy is enough to produce the same frequency of the next atomic orbital -higher level of energy- then the electron makes the “jump” into the next atomic orbit. If the lower orbit remains incomplete then the electron that jumped up in energy level because of the absorption of the photon will return to its original lower orbital and scatter a photon of the same energy of the difference between orbits. It’s a fact that electrons could jump more than one energy level (orbital) at the same time given that the photon(s) were capable of supplying the needed energy differential between energy levels. This phenomenon of multiple simultaneous jumps is possible to explain if you take into account my theory of the “infinite fractional space” explained in a series of previous articles. One important point is that the mass and charge of electrons is always the same while the energy of the atomic orbits vary as so it does the number of electrons that a given atomic orbit can hold. 

The same interpretation of mine about the interaction between the energy of a sub-atomic particle (quantum particle) like an electron and the “infinite fractional space” where the energy oscillates in between two states (duality principle) can be used to explain “tunneling”. The concept of tunneling can’t be explained by classical physical interpretations but it’s a phenomenon easy to explain under my theory. In principle what occurs during the tunneling of electrons across a physical “barrier” has a why and a how that happens just as every other physical phenomenon. How it happens concerns the “spread out” of the energy of the electron across the fractional infinite space surrounding the spherical volume of the electron. The cycle when the energy-mass-charge of the ‘particle state’ is completely spread into the fractional infinite space transforming them into a energy-magnetic-polarity of a wave. Why this happens is the interesting part. We know that the thick of the barrier must be minimal; the barrier must be thin to allow for the tunneling to occur. If you applied the principles of my theory, you’ll see that a solid barrier is containing a much denser [concentrated] fractional space than the vacuum. Atoms forming the barrier have a bigger volume of net energy and that volume translates into a greater infinite fractional space since the volume of atoms is greater than the volume of one single electron. Don’t forget that the ‘fractional infinite space’ around atoms is also the site of a duality (oscillatory process between particle-wave states) as the result of the oscillation between the electrons orbiting the outer levels or atomic orbits of the atoms. The process is full of uncertainties obviously but it’s only possible through this process. I’m not offering equations that I wouldn’t be able to produce but I can see the physical process in my mind as I have with the rest… gravity, EM wave formation and propagation, etc.

So! Now you can meet your physics professor or your friend and try to get from them some sort of convincing explanation as to WHY and HOW electrons are capable of absorbing energy from photons. 

Good luck with this one too!

Miguel De Zayas (The Wizard of π)

“Einstein’s ether versus my theory of an inward infinite and fractional space”

Correct me if I’m wrong but Einstein never got to explain how EM waves were “produced”, or what did the process possible, or the why for a cyclical electromagnetic oscillation, or how his ‘invisible and hypothetical ether’ interacted and why? I ask myself those same questions for years now and I can’t find a single shred of logic in anything I’ve seen so far. Then there is the duality wave-particle in quantum mechanics that I find so perfectly understandable that to me is just an understatement. Einstein never consciously agree with those postulates despite of accepting them after an overwhelming body of experimental results confirming the paradox. 

Humans see space as some sort of infinite cosmos, a vacuum that extends endlessly outward into remote places of our universe and beyond… Everyone in physics is looking outward but no one is paying attention to the infinite that exists within the ‘fabric of space’. We are made of matter and energy, everything we touch or see exists within a defined magnitude of space; the water we drink from a glass, the mass of our planet Earth, etc. Quantum mechanics helped us understand that even the smallest of the smallest sub-atomic particle is made of a defined quantity of energy or mass within and that despite their infinitesimal size, they all are QUANTIZED (unfortunately a word that not even automatic spelling is ready to accept). Then there is π (pi). This mathematical constant is practically everywhere in our most important equation in physics. I know neither physicists nor mathematicians ignore it but you and I know that they certainly “re-normalize” its value every time they work with it. I see their point in doing it, do not misunderstanding me, they need reliable results in their experiments and observations, they need to predict the effects of a physical phenomena in a practical way but every single time pi is re-normalized an important piece of the puzzle is sacrificed. I brought to your attention a very simple example to prove it. I considered a few facts and the consequences of ignoring the infinite fractional ‘tail of pi’. I began my point by stating an obvious fact; most manifestation of mass, matter and sub-atomic particles are spherical in shape. ex: planets, atoms, protons, electrons, quarks, stars… I think those examples are enough for you. I then resumed my analysis by stating that those physical entities can conceivably be contained in a three dimensional spherical containment that we call it volume. When I looked at the simple mathematical expression of the equation to calculate the volume of any sphere (independently of its size), I found our irrational constant (pi) right in the middle of it. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that the more decimals we take into account in our calculation of volume, the bigger the volume grows. Yes! its growth rate is almost undetectable because it’s so tiny but it’s real nonetheless. What would happened to a very small sub-atomic particle (a quantum particle) the exact instant it finds itself contained into a volume that in every sense was incompatible with its quantized nature? It’s logical to assume that the energy of the quantum would be caught inside an infinite space that extends inward into a dimension where its limited and innate indivisible nature doesn’t allow it to go. Since the inward infinite goes endlessly, it can hold that energy spread in a fractional pattern but up to a point where a recoiling process begins. The recoiling occurs because at one point the quantum energy becomes unstable and the pressure push the energy back into a corpuscular and pattern back into a particle state. This is an oscillatory process that implies two cycles and where the polarity of one magnetic cycle is flipped into its opposite one like the swinging of a pendulum. 

My theory explains why waves are formed, why we call charge when the quantum is in its corpuscular form and why a magnetic cycle appears when it is spread within the fractional infinite space of its own volume. It explains why the duality and obviously why the paradox theoretically known a the ‘Heisenberg uncertainty principle’ is perfectly natural and comprehensible. My theory also proves that there is no ether since there’s no need for one. My theory also explains what gravity is, since it’s the same phenomenon occurring at a big scale where huge masses of planets and stars are surrounded by a field made by the net or sum of that unfulfilled volume of fractional infinite within the fabric of space. The closer to the surface of the celestial body, the stronger the density of the distortion of space. The common property seen in both the electromagnetic field and gravity (both manifest effects of the inverse square law) proves that both physical phenomena find their process as a product of the same incompatibility between space on one side and mass, matter and energy on the other.


Gravity is not a different force, only the same result of the fractional and infinite nature of SPACE when instead of the energy of subatomic particle, space is occupied by huge bodies of MATTER. Why then the magnetic field and gravity would share the inverse square law? The attenuation of the magnetic field and gravity inverse to the distance is all taking place within the edges of the actual volume of the planet. Space is indeed “warped” or distorted and yes, that distortion is felt just as Einstein proposed in his equation but it has absolutely nothing to do with a space-time nature, that concept is a bad description of the distortion. The real distortion comes from the incompatibility between infinite space and quantized matter; just as the magnetic field comes from orientation of the fuzzy cloud of electrons within ferromagnetic materials. Imagine gravity as a higher density of infinite and fractional space at the edges of the volume of huge spheres. The emptiness of the concentrated space increases from space into the lower orbit of the planet acting as a force just as Newton depicted and Einstein proposed in his falling elevator. The “Casimir effect” was a successful experiment in what showed the attraction between two thin metal plaques separated for just a few nano-meters. QM justifies it as the effect of “virtual photons” but in my own opinion that’s a flawed vision. Atoms and molecules are spheres on their own and they form bonding each other resulting in metals but the individual volume of those molecules carry this fractional infinite in their edges too. When you connect a battery between the ends of a conductor and the magnetic field appears around it… that field is the oscillating cloud (FTL) produced by electric energy (electricity) moving across the empty space left by the molecules and atoms making for the wire or conductor. The actual charge when measured in the circuit is the charge of the electron (mass) their collapsed energy, the magnetic field is the cloud that propagates across the space left unfulfilled by the atoms of the conductor. That cloud is produced (just as gravity) at a FTL speed, the actual movement of the charges across the wire or conductor is much slower. 


Thank you for your time.

Author: Miguel De Zayas 
Facebook @thewizardofpi

“To be particle or to be a wave… that shouldn’t be a dilemma no more”

“It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do.” (Albert Einstein)

This is a dilemma that shouldn’t even existed had we understood the implications of infinite endowed to space when energy and mass were part of the equation. Obviously as you must have guessed by the quote posted above, it’s about the wave-particle duality concept of quantum mechanics. The concept is fine but the understanding where it comes from is missing until I explained it in my theory.


I said that the volume occupied by the energy of a quantum (which is always defined in magnitude) would confront a property of space totally ignored until now: the inward increasingly fractional infinite nature of the space contained in that specific volume. I also explained that the concept derives its logical origins in the irrationality of π and the incompatibility that arises from its own innate inability to contain that energy inside it. For more detailed explanation I suggest you click on the URL address showed above in red. What you need to understand is that a sub-atomic quantum particle is in a constant (speed of light) oscillation between a granular state (particle) and its own energy “sucked” or “pumped” into the “fractional infinite space”. An electron shows charge and mass while is in the corpuscular cycle of the oscillatory process and a magnetic one while is in the cycle spread inside the infinite “fabric of space”. 

I’ll stop at this very moment to explain what’s magnetism and how it is related to the infinite nature of an inward fractional space. When an electron is in its particle cycle (of its duality nature), it has two important properties: (1) mass (2) charge. However, when it is in its cycle when the energy is entirely spread into the fractional infinite vacuum inside the volume of a sphere, the energy creates two poles; one positive and one negative as we have denoted them (for pure conventional purposes); just like the oscillatory path of a pendulum. What’s new in my theory is that the creation of the magnetic field comes to play as the result of the energy of a quantum particle is completely “dissolved” or “spread” across a region of space never considered before by any theory; a growing fractional reality that extends into the infinite of the smallest realm. I recalled the example I was told once that “if every time you step half the distance of the previous one, you will never reach your destiny”. This can illustrate the phenomenon happening to the quantum energy into a realm of space that we will never be able to reach. 

It’s truly amusing to read about the debate between physicists and the colorful implications of a duality in our physical world. However physics shouldn’t be a freak show aimed to put our imagination to work into impossible scenarios; physics is supposed to explain things not impose concepts not completely understood and make you to believe them without hesitation. Werner Heisenberg proposed a theory that gained to him a Noble Prize in physics; The Uncertainty Principle. He was right! The uncertainty lies in the instantaneous oscillatory process that occurs between a corpuscular energy of a quantum and the infinite nature of the space within its space volume. This is the reason I mentioned to you that my theory can’t be proved by the means of observation; since it goes straight to the ‘heart of the duality itself” (!) Bohr regarded this “duality paradox” as metaphysical and it was the subject of controversial arguing between Einstein and him. 

Let’s show one example less theoretical and philosophical so you can see the effects of this infinite fractional property of space. We know what a coil is; a piece of a wire with turns to produce concentric circles one besides the other. When electrical charges move across the wires of a coil they create a magnetic field around it. The field is progressively formed as long as charges move into the coil up to a point where a balance between energy and the capacity of space allows it.

When is that “balance” reached? It’s reached when all the energy of the quantum is “sucked” into the infinite space within the volume. Just like when you depict an EM wave in propagation across the vacuum, you see two opposite but proportional cycles as Maxwell proposed a long time ago; one magnetic cycle followed by one electric one at c.

Let’s resume with the previous example: What we get? We have a magnitude of energy oscillating between the two quantum states (charge-magnetism) or one corpuscular state of energy and another spread energy into an inward infinite space capacity. The space capacity is infinite but the energy of the quantum particles is not, so the entire number of charges will be eventually recoiled into its corpuscular form (electron charges) and will move away from the coil in an opposite cycle with respect to the original one; the so-called pendulum effect. What happens if we introduced a piece of iron inside the coil? The matter of the iron contains a higher volume of empty space so the potential capacity to store electric charges will increase and therefore its magnetic response ( a higher intensity magnetic field). Physics used a term for it: permeability. 

In conclusion the dilemma is one limited by our limited capabilities to observe the phenomenon. The duality is real and its oscillatory interchange elapses in almost instantaneous amount of time. This duality dilemma accompanied Einstein until the last hours of his productive life and keeps fascinating physicists for decades to go.

Miguel De Zayas is The Wizard of Pi