” 1 3 7 ” a proof of my THEORY







The “Bird” Professor Richard Feynman Referred on his quote on top, could easily be referred to the unknown origins of 1 3 7, the Alpha Constant also known as the “Fine Structure constant”. Let’s see the argument from a “Philosophical angle:

“In 1982, Frank Jackson formulates the intuition underlying his Knowledge Argument in a much cited passage using his famous example of the neurophysiologist Mary:

Mary is a brilliant scientist who is, for whatever reason, force to investigate the world from a black and white room via a black and white television monitor. She specializes in the neurophysiology of vision and acquires, let us suppose, all the physical information there is to obtain about what goes on when wee see ripe tomatoes, or the sky, and use terms like “red”, “blue”, and so on. She discovers for example, just which wavelength combinations from the sky stimulate the retina, and exactly how this produces via the central nervous system the contraction of the vocal chords and expulsion of air from the lungs that results in the uttering of the sentence “The sky is blue”… What will happen when Mary is released from her black and white room or is given a color television monitor? Will she learn anything or not? It seems just obvious that she will learn something about the world and our visual experience of it. But then is it inescapable that her previous knowledge was incomplete. But she had all the physical information. Ergo there is more to have than that, and Physicalism is FALSE.” [end quote].

The argument contained in this passage may be put like this:

(a) Mary has all the physical information concerning human color vision before her release. 

(b) But there is some information about human color vision that she does not have before her release.

(c) Not all information is physical information.

The two versions proposed in the previous philosophical argument known as the weakest and the strongest ones are resumed as follows:

(I) the weakest: “There is some kind of knowledge concerning facts about human color vision that is non-physical knowledge”


(II) The strongest: “There are non-physical facts about human color vision that Mary does not know before her release, therefore there are non-physical facts concerning human color vision.

I’m in total agreement with the first argument! However I admit that the evidences that I have experienced during my research in the field of Numerology regarding the study of “YHWH” and Kabbalah’s Table of the 72 Names of God have left some doubts about the solidity of my first statement.

Anyway! I guess, this was Professor Feynman’s allusion to the Bird-to-know analogy in his quote. He also mentioned in one of his famous quotes regarding the nature and origins of the Alpha Constant (1 3 7 ) that physicists didn’t know how to make a computer to produce this number but that without it nothing could work in their calculations. (these were not exactly his words but you probably learned about it in past readings so there is no place for criticism here).

1 3 7 Proof of my THEORY

The first post I published in this site proposed a new theory about the relationship Energy-Space. In it, I graphically represented what I believed was the most reliable way to understand what the Fine Structure looked like while structured inside the volume occupied by a quantum of energy in a point in space.

I clearly showed the dividing lines between harmonics by a line represented by the digits 3, 6 and 9 in different configurations. (to learn more about the details of my Theory, I advise you to read the entire concept first).

This is my argument about “the unknown bird”…

(a) I said that the Fine structure was a line with no physical allowance for Energy of any kind. (no quantized energy within the line).

(b) I said that the quantum number called “spin” of the particle (string) occurs around this fine dividing line (a sort of internal rotation of the two components of the harmonic).

Let’s then assume that this line with a hypothetical “vacuum” nature could be represented by a zero (0) or a one (1). I would like to remind you at this point that if you take a brief look at my ‘Table of equivalence of “implied number” values’ both, 0 and 1 hold the same value = (20) and I explained earlier on in my paper titled “Alien Numbers” that a quantum of energy could never be assumed to be any of those two values (0 or 1) for the simple and logical reason that concepts like one, half, fraction or decimal of a quantum is nonsense in nature. Even ONE is two in essence. You are aware of the polarity of light even when you’d be looking at one single photon propagating through space.

So! Now we have basis to assume the following “implied” equality:


One quantum of energy is spinning around a vacuum that forbids the presence of  ‘quantized energy’.

Obvious to anyone, this little “equation” implies that there are two (2) entangled halves (the only possible way to conceive the notion of half quantum) spinning around a Fine line. Are you with me so far? Good!

Let’s then calculate what this “equation of mine” looks in “implied values”:

20 + 0 +20 = 40

Now let’s take the second part of this analysis… I said all along in the context of “my Theory of Everything” that after Energy resolved its incompatibility to be able to fit within a point of space (sphere) [restricted by the limitations imposed by the irrationality of the mathematical constant π (hence the name “Pi Paradox”)], an extra unit of quantized energy had to continue “crawling around like a baby”, because a quantum of energy cannot be divided by any means; [see Max Plank work].

It’s all explained in the paper titled ” The Theory of Everything “, I’m trying to explain only,what’s necessary for you to understand the procedure that helped me to calculate 1 3 7 from the analysis.

…and Why? Because they were originated inside harmonics and the net energy value has been previously set that way. [everything has a cause, remember?].I said (continuing with my hypothesis) that as the “leftovers” from the original string resumes its new configuration around and within the point of energy of space, a new angle will be acquired along with a new dimensional context adding one new dimensional axis and keeping two. That will occur at the distance corresponding to the arc = to one diagonal of the circle starting from  the first reference point (036) in a clockwise direction (according to the right hand rule).

But! If you take a close look at my Wheel…

1 mgpx wheel

You will be able to count how many harmonics that solution would (necessary) implied:

let’s see closer…(1) Purple at 036, (2) Orange at 369, (3) Yellow at (693), (4) Green at 936 …and (5) at Blue at 693 as the Energy begins the transition into a different polarity or from potential-kinetic energy. Correct so far?

So! we meet number 5 finally!


The “implied value of number 5 = (22) [see my table of equivalence). I thing we’re ready now to calculate the net “implied value” of the Next Solution:

[5] + [0-1-0] = 22 + 40 = 62! Just the same value obtained from adding up

Now things are pretty easy:

dividing 62 by 45 or 62/45 = 1.37 77777777777 


The day this particular article was published I haven’t discovered yet graphically the meaning of 137. I thought 62 was the key to get it but it was during my analysis at the 24th triad instead of 12th. 24 triads mean 24 x 3 = 72 decimals of π without counting the Root (3.14)

It was so simple!!! 24 made perfect sense since the same phenomenon occurred in the reduced series of Fibonacci numbers right after concluding the reduction of the 24th a 9 is always there waiting for us!

This is one example more that the concept of “implied value” of a number or letter is legitimate and something entirely ignored within the context of today’s science.

Go back to my model Euler-Pi Wheel again and check this from left to right:

[036⇑] + [369⇑] + [693⇑] + [936⇑] (potential energy) + [936⇓] + [693⇓] + [396⇓] + [036⇓⇑] (Kinetic energy) + [369⇑] + [693⇑] + [369⇑] + [036⇑⇓]


The string will need 24 to fit within the point in space!







Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s